0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Okay well, Let's just get this out there. Just because there are high restrictions on guns, to the point where no one has a fire arm, People will still have guns. Specifically criminals. Take prohibition for example. The government banned alcohol, and look what it caused. Prohibition formed organized crime and people still had alcohol. Entire towns would fight federal agents to keep their beer. Don't you think a ban on firearms would spike criminal activity like Prohibition did? Just because you take one dealer out, an addict will find another source.
Quote from: Pancake Of Doom on June 11, 2012, 11:02:11 PMOkay well, Let's just get this out there. Just because there are high restrictions on guns, to the point where no one has a fire arm, People will still have guns. Specifically criminals. Take prohibition for example. The government banned alcohol, and look what it caused. Prohibition formed organized crime and people still had alcohol. Entire towns would fight federal agents to keep their beer. Don't you think a ban on firearms would spike criminal activity like Prohibition did? Just because you take one dealer out, an addict will find another source.Chicago we say only the crinimals are allowed to have guns. You have no real legal ground to stand on with any protective weapons. I have been to parties where people have gotten shot and it is those type of thingsthat make me want to keep my switchblade with me or purchase a firearm.The police don't really protect here and only sometimes find the culprits in cases of robbery.
I've proved people wrong on so many occasioans
Oh wow I do.Its because. I'm really active on the forum.
3 Days isn't log
Those that have access to guns (White Canadians) are usual seen as trigger happy lumber jacks. In reality, they're pretty mellow people. I haven't recalled any abusing their privileges.Those that illegally have access to guns are in a higher advantage than Canadians who do not have access to them and would abuse that. Recently (i mentioned this once before) a hitman intentionally targeting 1 person, accidently shot several others.I wish Canada was more like Norway. I understand that Norwegian law enforcement officers are seen without any firearms. In fact, it has the lowest crime rate and prisons, are less like rehab centers.Point being, firearms are a slight significant contributors to crime rates.
Quote from: Doc. Mentalist S. on June 14, 2012, 12:16:32 AMThose that have access to guns (White Canadians) are usual seen as trigger happy lumber jacks. In reality, they're pretty mellow people. I haven't recalled any abusing their privileges.Those that illegally have access to guns are in a higher advantage than Canadians who do not have access to them and would abuse that. Recently (i mentioned this once before) a hitman intentionally targeting 1 person, accidently shot several others.I wish Canada was more like Norway. I understand that Norwegian law enforcement officers are seen without any firearms. In fact, it has the lowest crime rate and prisons, are less like rehab centers.Point being, firearms are a slight significant contributors to crime rates.Yes but it just tends to be more illegal weapons used in crimes, then legal ones.Also yeah everybody should take a page from Norway when it comes to that stuff esp here in the US. Look at Cal, they have that stupid get tough on crime mentality and their jails are overflowing, and most of the prisoners come back or are repeated.
Quote from: Old Crow on June 14, 2012, 12:29:59 AMQuote from: Doc. Mentalist S. on June 14, 2012, 12:16:32 AMThose that have access to guns (White Canadians) are usual seen as trigger happy lumber jacks. In reality, they're pretty mellow people. I haven't recalled any abusing their privileges.Those that illegally have access to guns are in a higher advantage than Canadians who do not have access to them and would abuse that. Recently (i mentioned this once before) a hitman intentionally targeting 1 person, accidently shot several others.I wish Canada was more like Norway. I understand that Norwegian law enforcement officers are seen without any firearms. In fact, it has the lowest crime rate and prisons, are less like rehab centers.Point being, firearms are a slight significant contributors to crime rates.Yes but it just tends to be more illegal weapons used in crimes, then legal ones.Also yeah everybody should take a page from Norway when it comes to that stuff esp here in the US. Look at Cal, they have that stupid get tough on crime mentality and their jails are overflowing, and most of the prisoners come back or are repeated. Sadly that is also what contributed to how unready we were for a massacre, there was also many reasons for that though =/ It was only 1 nutcase, but 1 nutcase is too much. Now Norway has helicopter snipers able to move swiftly in. I believe Norway has shown that gun restrictions can very easily work and can bring down crime rates. You can argue that this will not at all work for America, but remember Norway used to be one of the most heavily armed countries in the world, they literally sold shotguns over the counter in normal convenience stores. I still think we remain one of the most heavily armed countries in the world actually, but our gun restrictions have still seriously cut down the crime rates.
This whole thing is a travesty.For starters, Pillz is obviously the sexiest.
Age, license and restrictions are irrelevant as long as someone out there is allowed to buy guns. You don't need to be 18, or have anything on you at all for your "friend" to hand you a loaded gun. Sometimes all you need is money, and until guns are illegal completely, they'll always be in arms reach if someone wants to shoot somebody.Guns makes killing easy and fast; and giving every idiot who joins the police force a gun isn't to bright either.
The people who would go out of their way to get an illegal weapon are probably going to kill them regardless; while they would never cease to exist, it'd be nice if any idiot off the street could get a gun. I mean I myself am waiting to get a gun and if the situation called for it I would use it. I'm all for being able to protect myself but the only reason I need to is because anyone out there could have a gun.Most armed criminals don't use them to kill either; they're a last resort tool of intimidation. It gives people power who don't deserve iit and while many people get caught for their crimes; lots of others don't. There are many murders at go unsolved regardless of if someone was shot. Having the bullet type isn't as helpful as most people think; usually it's prexisting quarrels or witnesses who help identify killers.. I don't know.. We should just make the only legal guns tranqs, but wed probably just see an increase in rapes.. :x You should have the right to disable a threat; not end their life. Also if another country attacked I don't think us suburbians would run into the steets with guns. We could sign up for the military though.I wish we cloud use tranqs in war too, but guns just make murder amongst ourselves so much easier than if we weren't allowed to have guns. You wouldn't have the angry kids taking dads gun, or joe blow gangsta getting his first gun to do whatthefuck ever.I don't have any specific stance on the subject but I don't like how the weak can overpower you because they have a gun. We can fight amongst ourselves with fists and blades but that'd be impossible I suppose. Senseless killing wll happen regardless; who knows what would help prevent it..