MW3, or BF3

[mau5_V_]

Allright guys ill start this one off i personally like bf3 a lot better, simply because i suck and i feel better about my self when i blow someone up with a tank, or kamakazie them with a jet. You just cant do that in mw3

[Zukuto]

Neither.

SKYRIM ALL THE WAY

But seriously, BF3 trumps that MW2 map pack people call a game.

[Hair Slut]

MW3 simply because EA will ban people for a problem they wont fix.

[Pillz]

Skyward Sword.

[Finniespin]

What ever the FUCK any person wants

[Lone Mudkips]

I never played it but I would go for Battlefield 3. Would you rather play the same crap made by Infinity Wards or Treyarch every year?

[Old Crow]

MW3=MW2 plus MOR explosion, MOR new guns, same multilayer bullshit that wont be fixed for months.

Battlefield 3= an attempt to build on the good parts of Bad Company 2 but it has Origins.

Def gonna get BF3 even if i had to get Origins. I know for STOW Origins will be required too but if they don't stop being stupid with Steam then that's all im getting from EA for a while.

[ELBdelorean]

Neither + Halo.

But if I had to choose it would be BF3.

[Fullmetal Megadave]

Modern Warfare 3 is basically the same multiplayer game as the others.
Battlefield 3 Takes the good parts of Bad Company 2 and mixes it with the Battlefield formula to create awesomeness.

[Whitellama]

because i suck and i feel better about my self when i blow someone up with a tank, or kamakazie them with a jet. You just cant do that in mw3

Everyone feels better about themselves after kamikazeing with a jet!

I haven't gotten to play MW3 yet, but based on what I've read, my guess is that I'll like BF3 more.

(I mean seriously, no more dolphin dives?) D:

[Finniespin]

One does everybody say Bf3 with a little of Bad company 2.

Didn't ANYONE played bf2??

[symbolzzzz]

I'm sorry but both are kinda crap.
BF3 isnt even close to being completed, way too many bugs, crashes, random DCs, map unbalances and so on. + EA is a bunch of shitstains that want to ban you for a problem they have. And of course Origin, the nonfunctional, unneeded, nothing adding, processing power hogging money grubbing assfuck excuse for a program.

MW3 yes its rehashed but there is nothing really wrong with that, the "zombie" mode in it is a ton of fun and worth a lot, the mp itself has quite a few nice things and there are not really too many problems. Dont get tubed often, air support isn't utter op shit anymore.

MW3 is a game when you play when you want to have random exploding fun, it's a personal preference and its dumb to hate someone because of it.
BF3 on the other has objective problems rather than subjective. So this means that when you are being objective then you have to pick MW3, but both are crap so it doesn't really matter.
Its like comparing a turd and and a turd that has some sugar coating on it, sure one might be better but the other one but they are still turds.

[mau5_V_]

meh all i am sayingis A. i agree they are no where near the best games skyrim is beast, and B. my point is mw3 is the same thing as the others, but with more maps and some new retarded gamemodes. where as Bf3 has new maps, new weapons, new vehicles, new weapons on the vehicles. i personnally would rather play garrysmod anyways because it never gets old

[Pillz]

MW3 is the gift given to all the people who hated BlackOps, and preferred the InfinityWard build of Call of Duty, like MW1 and MW2. The only thing I really liked about BO was: Zombies, Flamethrowers, and diving down flights of stairs to take massive fall damage.

In specs of being a greater Modern Warfare, MW3 does just that. The multiplayer is back to the way I like it, yet I didn't notice any Zombies, so idk what Symbolzz is talking about. Still figuring out a whole bunch of shit, like the multiple kill streak reward trees and such, but I also don't see anything that would make you not want to play the game.

BF3 has jets, you can see your feet and it looks more realistic. Not sure about all those bugs but I still want to play it, the campaign looked sexy as hell.

Really, all the games suggested in this thread are good games, probably the like, top 10 of the past few years, so arguing which one is better is pointless.. usually arguing any opinion is pointless but yeah..

[Cortez (Mr. T. FOO!)]

I didn't play BF3 outside of the beta and it was okay gameplay but ridiculously glitchy but I can't exactly say which game is better.

With MW3 I feel that they fixed 90% of the problems I've had with the past two games, the campaign is pretty epic, survival is actually awesome and the quality of multiplayer actually isn't that bad if you play with friends.

So in my uniformed opinion I have to say MW3 but like I said, I haven't played BF3.