0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
This whole thing is a travesty.For starters, Pillz is obviously the sexiest.
When the poster first starts answearing and/or agreeing it is often to late, meaning there is a assload of bad comments and stuff a moderator needs to either 1 fix or 2 delete. Locking a thread prematurely is a safety precaution in many cases.
Quote from: Jorgen on July 06, 2011, 09:49:51 AMWhen the poster first starts answearing and/or agreeing it is often to late, meaning there is a assload of bad comments and stuff a moderator needs to either 1 fix or 2 delete. Locking a thread prematurely is a safety precaution in many cases.If it gets THAT serious, then sure, but in most cases they really don't need to lock it, or move it. If someone is being extremely racist or starts a "Jorgen sucks cock" thread, sure that'll get locked, but you get what I mean. Like in the Sandbellie thread case, Monkeymacs comment could of been deleted, sandbellie could of been addressed, she herself could of locked the thread and we'd all be semi-happy.Also I still think OP should be allowed to delete or at least "hide?" posts in their threads. By hide, and this is hypothetical, but some way to temporarily remove a comment, while it sits in stasis, waiting to be judged by a mod, seeing whether it gets to stay deleted, or return to it's place.