The Existence of God/Gods

[Wholegrain]

as long as crypto's souless soul raoms this earth looking to make people sad and suck off their fun and happiniess i belief in on gawd

someone once said

"DER IF NO GAWD ROUN SO HE AINT REL"
- that one guy

I have power with my words i made Crypto convert from Catholicisim to Athiesim

I WON THE DEBATE WITH CRYPTO IT TOOK NEARLY A YEAR BUT I WON IT WHEN HE CHANGED I WAS SO PROUD OF MYSELF THAT HE LOST AND I WON

from here on out please keep in mind that a simple wholegrains consistently reliable data mind fucked crypto into submission

[Cadaver]

There is a "god," for everyone...

[Atom]

All I know is that science will never prove that god does not exist because of the question "What if God made Science?"

[crypto]

YOU ARE SO.

FUCKING.

STUPID.

[AlphaWeeaboo]

All I know is that science will never prove that god does not exist because of the question "What if God made Science?"

/facepalm
That is ASSUMING there is a God of course.

[Luingar]

i am an atheist. however, i am extremely receptive to the possibility that we are all simulations on a massively powerful computer, and that what we might consider "gods" might simply be our programmers, who, to the uninformed and easily influenced ancient masses, might be seen as gods due to their abilities to warp and manipulate reality seemingly at will.

[Jorgen]

simulations < thoughts
all I shall say in that reply

in other news
if you are to prove god, it would be like proving the existence of a graviton.
you might have seen it, but no1 else would ever get to understand that, it was a graviton you saw.
(graviton mass less theoretical particle, that according to one part of string theory might be able to go from one plane to another)

so umm just lay of it in other words

[crypto]

i am an atheist. however, i am extremely receptive to the possibility that we are all simulations on a massively powerful computer, and that what we might consider "gods" might simply be our programmers, who, to the uninformed and easily influenced ancient masses, might be seen as gods due to their abilities to warp and manipulate reality seemingly at will.

That is equivalent to believing in God.

[Mindtrixx]

i am an atheist. however, i am extremely receptive to the possibility that we are all simulations on a massively powerful computer, and that what we might consider "gods" might simply be our programmers, who, to the uninformed and easily influenced ancient masses, might be seen as gods due to their abilities to warp and manipulate reality seemingly at will.

That is equivalent to believing in God.

BUT IT SOUNDS SO COOOOOOL!   

[Boxman]

You have no idea how much self-control it takes to keep myself from saying things to you that would get me banned.

Well sorry.
I've had the awareness of a troll this week.

And why are you such a hostile person?

I don't want to argue about whether or not a god exists considering the large following of christians/catholics [specifically]. And like I said earlier, only the ignorant argue about religion.

[crypto]

You are genuinely retarded.

[Kwaurtz]

You have no idea how much self-control it takes to keep myself from saying things to you that would get me banned.

Well sorry.
I've had the awareness of a troll this week.

And why are you such a hostile person?

I don't want to argue about whether or not a god exists considering the large following of christians/catholics [specifically]. And like I said earlier, only the ignorant argue about religion.

You are right in the fact that only ignorant argue about religion.


Because through argument one gains knowledge and perspective to fill that void of ignorance. To be ignorant means to be unknowing. By arguing one can state their belief, their reason, and their logic, and thus we may be able to come to understand one another and learn something about ourselves that we may not have known.

If you were trying to use that as an insult, I suggest you drop it. and Crypto play nice

[OMG_ZombiePenguin]

 flower.gif This thread is full of kicks and giggles.

[Boxman]

You are right in the fact that only ignorant argue about religion.


Because through argument one gains knowledge and perspective to fill that void of ignorance. To be ignorant means to be unknowing. By arguing one can state their belief, their reason, and their logic, and thus we may be able to come to understand one another and learn something about ourselves that we may not have known.

If you were trying to use that as an insult, I suggest you drop it. and Crypto play nice

I'm not trying to insult him, what I'm TRYING to say is that he's trying to shove his belief down everyone's throat without listening to their reasoning behind it as well. I refuse to argue with you either, because if I did, I know that someone's going to bitch and moan about MY reasoning/logic.

[crypto]

I have listened to their reasoning. I have rebutted it. And I have repeated the basic mathematical and scientific concepts that disprove it in general.

And stop fucking saying that I have any "belief" about religion. Atheism is a rejection of all religious "beliefs."

A1. Person A buys a lollipop.
A2. Person A buys something.
B1. Person B buys nothing.
B2. Person B . . . um, OH YEAH, PERSON B BUYS NOTHING, HAHAHA.