Homosexuality: Defect or necessary animal trait?

[Coreybush11]

Is this hard to understand?

Yeah, I had to read it a few times to get it. So basically you're not posting in this thread anymore, then you made rules for the thread, you don't think gays deserve to be irradiated you just think they're born with a defect you don't have, and said you won't post if people aren't going to attempt to read your posts.

Honestly our best bets are in skepticism. Everything that pops up over the next few years will be theories and experiments. I feel like we trust too much in science these days, and some studies should never be publicized, small studies with little backing that cause false belief and whatnot, I'm not saying that about anything posted in this thread, but in general.

Also, no one ever answered the bisexuality questions, if it's a defect, how does it manage to HALFWAY affect people? :l

Like when someone is born with half their body paralyzed? ... 

If there isn't a gene for homosexuality, then there shouldn't be one for heterosexuality.

The gene must be for reproduction, then. And the owner of said gene is free to try and reproduce in whatever way his own mind desires. And his mind is usually made of the experiences of his life. I guarantee you, that if someone is raised in a homosexual family with the same thinking of many parents in the last twenty years, believing anything that doesn't agree with their religion and social norms is horribly wrong and you deserve to die for it, that person would turn out homosexual.

[Jorgen]

you don't think gays deserve to be irradiated

irradiated you say??? what does radiation have to do with anything?

[Inject OH 4]

Is this hard to understand?

Yeah, I had to read it a few times to get it. So basically you're not posting in this thread anymore, then you made rules for the thread

See a doctor right now. Immediately! You clearly have tumor. My post was very easy to understand was written clear and easy to read.
If you couldn't read it its because of your own problems not mine. I took a long time on my first post on this thread. The second no but I was yelling after that because people were misreading my easy to read post.

And I'll post now that you seem to have figured it out.

And bisexual isn't half way effecting you. Bisexual and homosexual are two different things.
I'm aware that they both contain homosexual relations. I'm just saying that the 2-20% study would have included bisexuals.

Both things would however be sperate things in terms of topics.

[Coreybush11]

I'm always ignored 

[SkiesAhoy]

I'm always ignored 

Tell me about it.

Also, guys, take a look at this:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0</a>

Interesting theories, amirite? Also, ignore the guy Dawkins is talking to.

[Pillz]

I'm always ignored 

It's hard to argue with something that make sense

[Jorgen]

I'm always ignored 

Tell me about it.

Also, guys, take a look at this:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0</a>

Interesting theories, amirite? Also, ignore the guy Dawkins is talking to.

that awkward moment when in the end he supports what I was saying all the time, seeing that he said this is my theory then sais pretty much exactly what I said in a more gay friendly tone.

[SkiesAhoy]

I'm always ignored 

Tell me about it.

Also, guys, take a look at this:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0</a>

Interesting theories, amirite? Also, ignore the guy Dawkins is talking to.

that awkward moment when in the end he supports what I was saying all the time, seeing that he said this is my theory then sais pretty much exactly what I said in a more gay friendly tone.

That awkward moment when in the end he presents ONE of the THREE hypothesis he believes in. And BTW, he is not saying that it's not determined by genes, he explaining the environmental effect on the activation of said genes.

[Jorgen]

I'm always ignored 

Tell me about it.

Also, guys, take a look at this:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0</a>

Interesting theories, amirite? Also, ignore the guy Dawkins is talking to.

that awkward moment when in the end he supports what I was saying all the time, seeing that he said this is my theory then sais pretty much exactly what I said in a more gay friendly tone.

That awkward moment when in the end he presents ONE of the THREE hypothesis he believes in. And BTW, he is not saying that it's not determined by genes, he explaining the environmental effect on the activation of said genes.

A gene might make you more susceptible to becoming gay later on in life, and the trigger point would be something in the environment. Which is what I have been stating all along, a definite gay gene would mean that you with a 100% accuracy will become gay if you have i, and also it would say all gay men will be alike in one or several specific ways.

A definite gene would be your eye color you can not chose that due to the environment.

[SkiesAhoy]

I'm always ignored 

Tell me about it.

Also, guys, take a look at this:

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHDCAllQgS0</a>

Interesting theories, amirite? Also, ignore the guy Dawkins is talking to.

that awkward moment when in the end he supports what I was saying all the time, seeing that he said this is my theory then sais pretty much exactly what I said in a more gay friendly tone.

That awkward moment when in the end he presents ONE of the THREE hypothesis he believes in. And BTW, he is not saying that it's not determined by genes, he explaining the environmental effect on the activation of said genes.

A gene might make you more susceptible to becoming gay later on in life, and the trigger point would be something in the environment. Which is what I have been stating all along, a definite gay gene would mean that you with a 100% accuracy will become gay if you have i, and also it would say all gay men will be alike in one or several specific ways.

A definite gene would be your eye color you can not chose that due to the environment.

LoL I don't even know why we are still posting, given that we are saying the same things. WHERE'S DIFFERENCE OF OPINION WHEN YOU NEED IT?