This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Old Crow
Pages: 1 ... 95 96 [97] 98 99 ... 184
1441
« on: November 29, 2012, 02:30:10 PM »
Sigh, they are two different gameplay styles, there's no use even vaguely trying to compare them. They only share the military theme and first person shooter aspect in common.
Different styles or not, I think Bf3 is way better.
Your opinion, but as Dark said they are two extremely different games, sure they both have pewpew and boom buttons, but the gameplay is very different, Bf3 is more open and tactical (And is open to ranged fighting) while CoD is more like an arcadey, kill to win kind of game - there's not a lot of skill involved, and sometimes that's the kind of game you need to play once in a while.
In any case I love both franchises, and they're both hecka fun (But if I play too much of either It makes me want to dropkick the producers in the throat.)
How is there no skill involved?? Sure it is much easier to pick up but have you seen some of the good players, they are nuts how good they really are, so I beg to differ that there is no skill. Also I would consider CoD more tactical (small firefights, very fast paced, limited objectives) while BF3 is more strategic if you want to win a game (much bigger maps, objectives are much more important then killing people)
1442
« on: November 27, 2012, 05:22:36 PM »
You know you had a good time playing with me 
1443
« on: November 27, 2012, 03:45:16 PM »
I'm game. Can help on Thursdays and Fridays
1444
« on: November 27, 2012, 03:57:40 AM »
Buying Black ops 2 all depends on who you are or how you feel about the franchise. Personally, I believe they are starting to over stretch the franchise. I can easily see this game being the last, well, at least from treyarch.
The thing that changed CoD forever was CoD 4, this mainly started all of their futuristic/more modern things like weapons and all that other shit. But, going future was way overboard, they took a huge risk by trying this and it FAILED. Everything is fucked up. You can't just add 2 weapons and a new scope or whatever "future" things they added and say it's a game based in the future. Honestly, call of duty is terrible, and need to rename the franchise to call of quickscope.
I hate call of duty and will probably until a new better one comes out. So yes, its a waste of money and fucking time.
Couldn't have said it better, Cod is a huge fail in gameplay but yet staying on the top because more and more 12 year olds buy the game and like sheep, make the company grow bigger.
Its funny because you guys think its just some twelve year old's buying the game. No there are obviously lots of teens and young adults buying it as well. It sells like crazy and it does for a reason. The gameplay can be simple and a little spammy but (cant believe I am defending CoD) Its probably the best tactical shooting game outside of CS. It requires a hair trigger, alot of looking over your shoulder, and shooting skills to come out on top. I will also disagree with you on the future part. Treyarch actually tries to do something different when it makes its CoD aka every one they have made so far. They try new things, and try to actually put together a good story (lets not say good, maybe an ok story). My point being, is that what Treyarch has done is much better then what MW2 and MW3 have done, which is to say have an actual story that feels like it has an impact. I enjoyed Black Ops 1 much better then MW2, and am finding Black Ops 2 enjoyable as well, hell its got Micky Rouke's voice in it (look it up) I will certainly agree that CoD4 was the height of the series, and nothing beats All Guilled Up, a classic game level in all of shooterdom. I will also agree that the series is stale, and if much does not change, they might lose their player base. I'll just say this. Something must be working if you are selling 200M games every single opening night. At that rate, they will outsell every Mario game combined.
1445
« on: November 27, 2012, 01:32:39 AM »
 Blue backround, with that mustang and the words Old Crow somewhere
1446
« on: November 26, 2012, 07:47:47 PM »
Anything previously said about its specs really don't matter. Nintendo said that again they are not going to focus on trying to beat Xbox or PS3 at graphics. They will move up to HD graphics but not up to the level of the PC or the next gen consoles.
Also if you look at the numbers, Nintendo won the last console war. True there were way to many shovelware games, but it brought Nintendo back from its N64/Gamecube mistakes to the top.
The WiiU looks appealing to me. Its got both a touch interface, and buttons, a plus over any tablet. It has first party Nintendo games, which are usually always great, and it looks like they are finally putting some semblance of multilayer into it as well. What we will have to see play out is if third party developers actually create games for it. Nintendo can't just survive on its first party titles alone, because people that bought the Wii will not buy the WiiU if its just going to have more shovelware on it, along with the fact that alot of small games can be played on smart phones.
The biggest question is what is Microsoft and Sony gonna do? Nintendo said that while the WiiU is sold at a loss, if you buy one game it is instantly profitable again, while if you look at the 360 and PS3 they were sold at about a 100 dollar loss, meaning that you needed to buy more then one game for it to make money, not a hard thing to do but hard enough apparently because Microsoft said that they made no money of the Xbox 360 and Sony only made it because of the Blu-Ray drive on the PS3.
Whats going to happen now? You won't sell many consoles for 600-800 dollars a pop to the current generation, and the PC market has bounced back stronger then ever. The WiiU is arguably in the best position to win again for Nintendo.
Once they drop in price a little down the road, I may consider getting one. Zelda games are some of my favorite, so hard to pass up.
1447
« on: November 26, 2012, 04:25:37 PM »
Are they only taking about the CPU branch or the whole wide thing?
whole thing brother.
1448
« on: November 25, 2012, 07:12:09 PM »
1449
« on: November 25, 2012, 02:46:39 AM »
Denied.
Still too bad of a taste from people here for you to be admin.
PM me if you have any questions
As a side note, all admin abuse should be properly posted in the right section, if admins are trolling, report them!
1450
« on: November 25, 2012, 12:54:25 AM »
Denied
1451
« on: November 24, 2012, 08:55:59 PM »
oh :/ well that sucks than i thnk there should be some type of policy on karma bans like u have to warn the person when they are getting close and give them _ amount of rounds to get the karma back up or something because id rather not go on the server for a week lol
Yes there is no requirement to be told to raise karma. Black do you have screenshots of damagelogs? I would like you to post them if you do, or multi as well. I will consider letting you off early if I can see what exactly went on.
1452
« on: November 24, 2012, 08:53:41 PM »
I can get it right now if nobody else hasn't.
Yes please. He needs to be gone.
1453
« on: November 24, 2012, 06:39:45 PM »
I am not home, so can somebody PERMABAN him. He has been permabanned but I guess it didn't carry over from source ban.
1454
« on: November 24, 2012, 10:19:00 AM »
Please get back onto topic.
I'm going to keep this open for another day or two.
It is on topic. Criticism on his app, is totally relevant to his app.
What I mean is asking me to put back personal attacks. Criticism and personal attacks are not one in the same.
1455
« on: November 24, 2012, 02:19:18 AM »
Please get back onto topic.
I'm going to keep this open for another day or two.
Pages: 1 ... 95 96 [97] 98 99 ... 184
ShoutBox!
|
Show Posts